About VRTubbies
VRTubbies is an editorial catalogue of VR adult videos. We index roughly 47,000 scenes from the major VR studios, score them against a fixed rubric, and write per-scene context so the page is genuinely useful instead of a generic redirect to the source studio.
Most VR “tubes” surface the same studio feeds with no editorial layer. Our take is to do the opposite — keep the catalogue indexed, but build a small editorial team on top who can be held accountable for the quality of each page. The team uses pseudonyms (Google's SQRG §3.4 explicitly permits this) and the bios below describe what each person actually covers day to day.
The editorial team
Alex Mavros
Senior VR Editor
4 years covering VR
Alex leads scene-level editorial for VRTubbies. Background in immersive video QA — joined the team in 2022 after four years moderating community VR catalogues. Day-to-day work covers studio audits, scoring calibration, and the weekly best-of-week rotation.
Focus: Studio audits · scoring calibration · weekly editorial picks
Mia Roselli
Hardware Specialist
5 years covering VR
Mia tests every scene we add against the headset matrix: Quest 2, Quest 3, Quest Pro, PSVR2, Pico 4, and Apple Vision Pro. She owns the format compatibility tags and the framerate / bitrate notes on each video page.
Focus: Headset compatibility · format tags · streaming-vs-download notes
Dani Kovacs
Catalog Editor
3 years covering VR
Dani maintains the model and category taxonomy and writes the editorial rubric documentation. She is the person responsible for splitting overlapping tags and retiring categories that no longer match indexed content.
Focus: Model pages · category curation · taxonomy hygiene
Jordan Tate
Comparisons Lead
3 years covering VR
Jordan runs the head-to-head studio comparisons and the "Best of" lists. Their reviews focus on what changes for the viewer between two similarly-positioned studios — codec quality, scene length distribution, format coverage, model rotation.
Focus: Head-to-head reviews · best-of lists · scoring methodology
How the catalogue is built
New scenes enter the catalogue from studio RSS feeds and partner data drops. They are tagged automatically against our rubric (format, resolution, runtime, content type), then passed through an AI-assisted copy stage that drafts the on-page summary. Every scene with a public page is then reviewed by an editor before it is allowed into the sitemap. Scenes that fail review are kept out of the sitemap and served with noindex.
We disclose the AI-assistance step openly on every page rather than burying it in our terms of service. The detailed walk-through of our scoring rubric, AI assistance disclosure, and review SLA lives on the methodology page.
Editorial independence and affiliates
VRTubbies earns revenue through affiliate links to the source studios. Studios do not pay us to be listed and they do not see review copy before it goes live. If a studio asks us to remove a scene we honour valid DMCA / takedown requests, but we will not retract a published review at studio request.
Contact
- Editorial inquiries: [email protected]
- DMCA / takedowns: /dmca
- Methodology and scoring rubric: /methodology